rest-api-performance
Introduction
Over the last year I have written REST APIs with various technologies and wanted to compare some of them. I created 5 identical clients with Elysia, Express, Rocket, Phoenix and Flask. I tested them on the simplest endpoint /get which returns a "Hello World" text message.
Each tested locally on a 2023 Macbook Air M2.
I used Ali for generating 10000 requests per second for each client.
Technologies
Node, JavaScript, Express
- Node: 20.5.1
- Express: 4.18.2
Bun, TypeScript, Elysia
- Bun: 1.0.18
- Elysia: 0.7.30
Python, Flask, Bjoern
- Python: 3.11.5
- Flask: 3.0.0
- Bjoern: 3.2.2
Rust, Rocket
- Rust: 1.74.0
- Rocket: 0.5.0
Erlang, Elixir, Phoenix
- Erlang: 26
- Elixir: 1.15.7
- Phoenix: 1.7.10
Test details
Each test was run for 10 minutes with 10000 requests per second which approximately sums up to 6 000 000 requests in total.
| status code 200 | status code 0 | success rate | total latency | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| rocket | 5999993 | 7 | 0,99999883 | 12m 12s |
| elysia | 5999949 | 51 | 0,99999150 | 17m 41s |
| flask | 5999852 | 148 | 0,99997533 | 21m 54s |
| phoenix | 5998778 | 1222 | 0,99979633 | 20m 50s |
| express | 5998840 | 1159 | 0,99980683 | 32m 5s |
Above are the most interesting results from all the runs. You can see whole reports here.
Rust
Rust with Rocket is clearly and unsurprisingly a winner. Rocket still is quite some time away from the 1.0 release but it already should be production ready.
JS/TS Bun Node
It is worth noting that technically Elysia and Express are both JavaScript frameworks, the main difference is with runtimes used to run the code. BunJS is a modern JS/TS runtime for which Elysia is optimized for. Express traditionally is run on NodeJS.
With Express ran on Bun we can see that it’s Bun doing most of the heavy-lifting:
| status code 200 | status code 0 | success rate | total latency | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| elysia | 5999949 | 51 | 0,99999150 | 17m 41s |
| bun express | 5999657 | 343 | 0,99994283 | 20m 19s |
| node express | 5998840 | 1159 | 0,99980683 | 32m 5s |
Python
How is Python that fast? It isn’t, Bjoern is a WSGI server written with C. I tried running Flask with Waitress first, a WSGI server recommended by the Flask team in the official docs, but the results were stunningly bad:
| status code 200 | status code 0 | success rate | total latency | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| flask bjoern | 5999852 | 148 | 0,99997533 | 21m 54s |
| flask waitress | 5927382 | 72618 | 0,98789700 | 17h 8m 8s |
Elixir
Phoenix has been a disappointment on every side. It didn’t deliver with stability nor speed. It is a REST framework, but it is designed for fullstack web applications. Generating a bare REST project is cumbersome and not very effective in the end (as you can see by comparing the language chart in this repo, Elixir projects are bloated).
To generate a regular phoenix project the following command is used:
mix phx.newI had to use this one:
mix phx.new --no-ecto --no-assets --no-dashboard --no-html --no-live --no-mailerIt might work great for bigger projects but for this experiment it was an overkill.